|
The Birth of Illusion
Akira Tatehata
Akio Kawai has been working recently
with tableaux of acrylic linen work on rawhemp canvas, but his
first work in this medium dates back to the string of tableaux,
he produced in the late 70's and early 80's. In the 10 odd years
following, his works diverged from the tableau style to a wide
variety of forms such as reliefs consisting of wooden boards
and paper, large floor installations, and outdoor environmental
works consisting of lawn raised in arch forms. However, it now
appears he is making a gradual return to the world of stoicism.
In retrospect, however, it may
be said that all these experiments essentially support his cosistent
awareness of flat surfaces. Even a relief of boards laid at random
and glued all over with paper aims to actualize the relationship
between the subatrate of the painting and the surface that has
been applied to it. The artist's eye, at the same time, turns
to the meaning of the materials used, and to the structure of
work.
The coarse texture of the hemp
tableau is painted with lines of nearly the same colour as the
canvas. These equal length lines are drawn at regular apacings,
sometimes horizontally, sometimes diagonally, and sometimes in
a hatchwork, all of which accentuate the systemic nature of the
repetitive structure. Perhaps "accentuate" is not the
correct word; because of the closeness of the colours, the lines
somehow melt midstream into the texure of the coarse hempen canvas.
At his 1979 exhibition at the Ginza
Kaigakan, Kawai wrote the following words. "(The even linework
on the linen cloth) is of the barest amount neccessary to allow
expression of both the substrate and the parts that have been
drawn in at the same time. My present concern is to attain illusion
for the surface in its own right, and to single out the spot
where this illusion gains autonomy. Irrespective of the material
that should be used, it is essential thate the expression should
approach that material in such a way that it is dissolved and
disappears."
In retrospect, it may be felt that
the above atatement unexpectedly signals farewell to the minimalism
of these seventies. What was born of minimalism was these called
systemic painting, which promoted to an excessive degree the
use of machine-like repetitive techniques. The object of this
was to drive from the canvas any trace of illusion. To achieve
this it was necessary to expose clearly the physical fact that
the surface of the canvas was indeed convered with another surface,
namely the paint. Kawai took the opposite point of view that
"in order for the surface, of its own, to attain illusion",
"expression itself must dissolve away." The idea that,
when expression dissolves, illusion springs to life, turns the
mainstream of painting thought on its head.
It would be a mistake to minimalise
this idea as simply a trick achieved by the similarity of the
colours. At this time, Kawai already held forth quite clearly
that as long as a painting is a painting,the obvious physical
nature of the surface and the literal nature of the surface could
not possibly exist. However we look at it,a painting is defined.
In fact, if we look back on thegreather works of minimalism now,what
we cannot help but feel is not some repellant physical surface,but
rather a profound sea that draws in our gaze.
|
|